The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thread

Want to let off some steam? Come and join in our forum-based games.

Moderator: General Forums Moderators

Forum rules
No consecutive posting in word games. If starting a new game, please check to see if there is already a similar game - such topics are likely to be locked.
Post Reply

Resolution #19 (NOTE: if you don't play the nations game, please do not vote)

Poll ended at 19 Nov 2012 22:43

Yay
6
75%
Nay
0
No votes
White vote
2
25%
 
Total votes: 8

User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Resolution #10, British Peacekeeping:
International Council of Nations,

CONSIDERING Britain is currently rebuilding after the War

AWARE That Britain currently has no Force to defend Itself from Attack, from both the Outside, and the Inside

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Resolution #9

REQUESTS That a Peacekeeping Force be set up within Britain
Don't know what more to say really.
DeletedUser14
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1879
Joined: 21 Jan 2012 18:59

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by DeletedUser14 »

For what purpose, in which parts of Britain, any additional measures that need to be taken, such as no fly zones, civilian police etc...
Je suis le patron et je vous emmerde!
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Resolution #10, British Peacekeeping:
International Council of Nations,

CONSIDERING Britain is currently rebuilding after the War

AWARE That Britain currently has no Force to defend Itself from Attack, from both the Outside, and the Inside

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Resolution #9

REQUESTS That a Peacekeeping Force be set up within the Whole of Britain

REASONS
a) Britain currently has no way to defend Itself from an Attack
b) Britain currently has no Police Force, leading to Rioting

ALSO REQUESTS A No-Fly Zone for the Whole of Britain be set up for all Non-British Military Aircraft, Airliners should be allowed in Certain, Pre-Decided Corridors only.
This Better?
DeletedUser14
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1879
Joined: 21 Jan 2012 18:59

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by DeletedUser14 »

Would military aircraft as part of the peace force be allowed? I'm thinking about surveillance aircraft in particular
Je suis le patron et je vous emmerde!
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

KasperVld wrote:Would military aircraft as part of the peace force be allowed? I'm thinking about surveillance aircraft in particular
An E-3 as part of the Peace Force, yes, a U-2, No.
Ark Royal
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
Posts: 718
Joined: 22 May 2012 16:08

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Ark Royal »

Resolution #11, English Peacekeeping:
International Council of Nations,

CONSIDERING England is being threatened by a superior power (Britain)

AWARE that the English have offered a ceasefire and it has not been accepted, and has offered to relinquish territory to Britain

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Resolution #9

REQUESTS That a Peacekeeping Force be set up within England, with a no-fly zone for ALL military aircraft, and a border protection force in Libya and ALL English and former British (now English) Territories south of the SIR.

REQUESTS That all disputed British/English territories north of the SIR be made a fully demilitarised zone until an agreement can be reached
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

Kira strongly opposes this last resolution proposal. England has accepted Kiran mediation, Britain has received our starting position and ceased fire, therefore we believe there is absolutely no need for a resolution of this kind.

Also, we would like to remind England (and other parties involved) that Kira, by accepting the role of the mediator, has also accepted to enforce peaceful negotiations, even if it means engaging our own military force as peacekeepers. We do not need to remind you again about our military strenght and current immense supremacy in both manpower and firepower over both Britain and England and on all fields of military activities.

To conclude, Kira has already accepted to protect ALL involved parties from ALL OTHER involved parties.


EDIT: Forgot, sorry...

Also, with regards to this resolution #11, we oppose the resolution #10 as well, for the same reasons as mentioned here.
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Do you have anything against Resolution #10?
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

Edited previous post. :lol:
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
User avatar
Last_Ninja_Monk
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1412
Joined: 24 Feb 2012 00:26

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Last_Ninja_Monk »

England's abusing the system to gain territory! They stole Britain's territory when they couldn't attack, now they can they try and hide behind the ICN.
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

Obviously, resolutions #10 and #11 are no longer required.
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
DeletedUser14
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 1879
Joined: 21 Jan 2012 18:59

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by DeletedUser14 »

The parties who submitted them may repeal them before voting
Je suis le patron et je vous emmerde!
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Britain removes Resolution #10.
Ark Royal
Chief Executive
Chief Executive
Posts: 718
Joined: 22 May 2012 16:08

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Ark Royal »

He republic of Wildebeastia removes res#11
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

Kiran proposal for a resolution #12

This resolution is supposed to declare the space and all astral bodies not to be subject to unilateral claims by any country on Earth.
Resolution #12 wrote:The International Council of Nations,

CONSIDERING that the space and all astral bodies are not part of the Earth and its political and other arrangements;

AWARE that several nations have already reached a portion of space and its astral bodies;

CONSCIOUS that other nations may reach space and its astral bodies;

DECIDES that space and astral bodies cannot be subject to claim by any nation on Earth and must remain at disposal for all nations;

DECIDES that all nations have the right to explore and exploit space and its astral bodies;

DECIDES that all eventual disputes about the forementioned will be settled in a peaceful manner in front of the ICJ;
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Can we add extra on? Namely:
FORBIDS any country, to put any Weapon, or part of a Weapons system, into Orbit.
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

Why? Kira doesn't agree with this as we already have weapon satellite(s).
(posted dozens and dozens of pages ago...)
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Because, it is extremely Dangerous, and can be seen as Threatening, especially when the Satellites fly over other Countries.
User avatar
Voyager One
Tycoon
Tycoon
Posts: 11204
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 09:47
Location: Rijeka, Croatia

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Voyager One »

We HAD satellites with nuclear missiles but we have scuttled those as those were a real threat (IKON satellites if you remember).

These ones that we currently have are in fact weapons but we don't intend to use them. We could apply the same argument of yours to your military airplanes - "what if they fly near or over another country"...
Leon

Image Image Image Image
"... all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by..." - John Masefield
User avatar
Pilot
General Forums Moderator
General Forums Moderator
Posts: 7655
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:48
Location: Banbury

Re: The Nations Game - International Council of Nations thre

Post by Pilot »

Point taken. And yes, I remember those IKON satellites very well, we first had to Rescue one, then, we had to help you sort them out.
Post Reply

Return to “Forum Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests