Forum for technical discussions regarding development. If you have a general suggestion, problem or comment, please use one of the other forums.
Moderator: OpenTTD Developers
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 10 Apr 2016 14:22
Leanden wrote: Any chance i can get you to update the first post with the win32/64 bundles so i can test it out?
I will do another release at some point in the near future, in the meantime, here's a win32 binary of commit d0aa4a53.
Attachments
openttd-custom-jgrpp-0.12.1-16-gd0aa4a5-MINGW-win32.zip (13.14 MiB) Downloaded 118 times
einsteinyh
Engineer
Posts: 46 Joined: 15 Feb 2016 01:22Location: Bogotá
Post
by einsteinyh 17 Apr 2016 02:13
Signals in Tunnels are not workingin v0.12.1 unless you place a signal after stations and before tunnels. In 0.12.0 they worked without any additional signal.
Attachments
Puerto Ordaz Transport, 18 Ene 1905.sav Configure tunnel signals in 2 tiles. (499.42 KiB) Downloaded 56 times
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 17 Apr 2016 10:53
einsteinyh wrote: Signals in Tunnels are not workingin v0.12.1 unless you place a signal after stations and before tunnels. In 0.12.0 they worked without any additional signal.
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "not working"?
There have been no signals on bridges/tunnels changes between v0.12.0 and v0.12.1 (there is an unrelated change for the next release though).
I haven't been able to get your savegame to work yet as it uses 15 GRFs which aren't available on bananas, most importantly including the train sets, can you provide a link or send me a copy?
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden 17 Apr 2016 13:29
I had an issue with the house placement patch but it may be negated by the fact i was using NewGRF Development Mode and its use is always shady at best.
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 18 Apr 2016 19:54
Leanden wrote: I had an issue with the house placement patch but it may be negated by the fact i was using NewGRF Development Mode and its use is always shady at best.
I couldn't reproduce this with either the old (v0.12.1) or new (next release) versions of the house placing patch.
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "do not appear"? If you close and re-open the house building window, does the problem persist? Does the problem persist across a save/load? Are you using any other house sets?
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden 18 Apr 2016 21:43
JGR wrote: Leanden wrote: I had an issue with the house placement patch but it may be negated by the fact i was using NewGRF Development Mode and its use is always shady at best.
I couldn't reproduce this with either the old (v0.12.1) or new (next release) versions of the house placing patch.
Can you be more specific about what you mean by "do not appear"? If you close and re-open the house building window, does the problem persist? Does the problem persist across a save/load? Are you using any other house sets?
In particular the error occurs with the GRF downloaded from here:
https://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/po ... uses/files
When you open the house placement window the top bar appears with no houses available. The problem persists across save/load, but opening a fresh scenario editor the houses are present. Specifically this is in the Artic climate. I haven't tested this with any other house sets however, but if i activate the parameter to keep TTD houses those do appear in the window.
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 18 Apr 2016 21:57
Leanden wrote: In particular the error occurs with the GRF downloaded from here:
https://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/po ... uses/files
When you open the house placement window the top bar appears with no houses available. The problem persists across save/load, but opening a fresh scenario editor the houses are present. Specifically this is in the Artic climate. I haven't tested this with any other house sets however, but if i activate the parameter to keep TTD houses those do appear in the window.
I still can't reproduce any issues with this. Can you try and see if the problem is still present in the most recent commit on git? There's a binary a few posts up if you're on Windows.
Leanden
Tycoon
Posts: 2613 Joined: 19 Mar 2009 19:25Location: Kent
Post
by Leanden 19 Apr 2016 00:12
The win32 from the top is the one im using.
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 19 Apr 2016 10:49
Leanden wrote: The win32 from the top is the one im using.
Yes, please do.
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 19 Apr 2016 22:19
nihues wrote: New ideas here
This is included now, an updated release is in the first post.
Auge
Director
Posts: 636 Joined: 23 Oct 2006 02:07Location: Berlin
Post
by Auge 20 Apr 2016 15:19
Hello
JGR wrote: Auge wrote: Is ist possible to implement the selection of vehicle groups as a criterion for restrictions in the restricted signals patch? Sometimes it would be useful to restrict the use of specific platforms to a group of trains without having the possibility to differentiate the vehicles with their max speed or the last, current or next orders.
This is implemented now, using a drop-down box.
I saw it the day after the commit and meanwhile I played a test game. Beau!Ty!Ful! Thank you.
JGR wrote: nihues wrote: +++Polyline Tool (I love this too)
This is included now, an updated release is in the first post.
This confused me again and again in my test game. Every time I wanted to use the normal™ multidirectional track tool, that
was the right one, I got the new.
As said, confusing.
Now, that I saw the new release (v 0.13) on Github, I will compile and play it.
Congratulations.
Tschö, Auge
d0mi3l
Engineer
Posts: 23 Joined: 16 Aug 2013 18:04Location: Poland
Post
by d0mi3l 24 Apr 2016 14:16
Game crash when I try "create group from list".
[+] Spoiler *** OpenTTD Crash Report ***
Attachments
crash.png (829.06 KiB) Not downloaded yet
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 24 Apr 2016 21:31
d0mi3l wrote: Game crash when I try "create group from list".
[+] Spoiler *** OpenTTD Crash Report ***
Thanks for reporting this issue, that item should not be present in the menu of group listings, I'll do a fix for the next version.
vazoun51
Engineer
Posts: 20 Joined: 05 Sep 2015 21:23
Post
by vazoun51 25 Apr 2016 23:17
Hi JGR,
thanks for new version and fixing the oil rig heliport bug. I have another one. Road vehicles profit in the main financial table is badly calculated. Number shown in this table should be very similar if not the same to the number in vehicle group info (group of all road vehicles). But that's not the case. Look at the pictures. It seems the difference is growing by the time. It's still v0.12.1 but since you didn't commit any changes related to this it should be the same in the new one. But I don't understand which patch can cause this.
Attachments
Armstrong & Co., 16-06-2214.png (286.95 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Armstrong & Co., 16-06-2214#1.png (258.04 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Armstrong & Co., 16-06-2214.sav (7.32 MiB) Downloaded 75 times
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 25 Apr 2016 23:46
vazoun51 wrote: Hi JGR,
thanks for new version and fixing the oil rig heliport bug. I have another one. Road vehicles profit in the main financial table is badly calculated. Number shown in this table should be very similar if not the same to the number in vehicle group info (group of all road vehicles). But that's not the case. Look at the pictures. It seems the difference is growing by the time. It's still v0.12.1 but since you didn't commit any changes related to this it should be the same in the new one. But I don't understand which patch can cause this.
This is due to the way that cargo payments are calculated with cargodest. You can adjust the setting to control the percentage of profit to pay in feeder systems in the accounting section of the settings, however large negative profits for road vehicles is fairly inevitable if your network is structured to use them as feeders for longer-distance services. This is not really a problem per se, more an artefact of the way that cargo payments are done in trunk.
vazoun51
Engineer
Posts: 20 Joined: 05 Sep 2015 21:23
Post
by vazoun51 26 Apr 2016 13:56
JGR wrote: vazoun51 wrote: Hi JGR,
thanks for new version and fixing the oil rig heliport bug. I have another one. Road vehicles profit in the main financial table is badly calculated. Number shown in this table should be very similar if not the same to the number in vehicle group info (group of all road vehicles). But that's not the case. Look at the pictures. It seems the difference is growing by the time. It's still v0.12.1 but since you didn't commit any changes related to this it should be the same in the new one. But I don't understand which patch can cause this.
This is due to the way that cargo payments are calculated with cargodest. You can adjust the setting to control the percentage of profit to pay in feeder systems in the accounting section of the settings, however large negative profits for road vehicles is fairly inevitable if your network is structured to use them as feeders for longer-distance services. This is not really a problem per se, more an artefact of the way that cargo payments are done in trunk.
I know the percentage of profit can be adjusted. But that means this amount is not added to the profit of the vehicle? Just payment for deliveries to the final destination? I didn't know. But maybe it's logical. When the amount for transfer would be counted towards profit it would be there twice (or multiple times). First for transfer and second for final delivery. Am i right? If yes, it makes group info a bit confusing...
Eddi
Tycoon
Posts: 8272 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 00:14
Post
by Eddi 27 Apr 2016 14:25
there's a big difference in vehicle bookkeeping (for individual vehicles and groups) and bank bookkeeping (for the balance sheet).
JGR
Tycoon
Posts: 2560 Joined: 08 Aug 2005 13:46Location: Ipswich
Post
by JGR 27 Apr 2016 18:04
That is how it is done in trunk, however this is modified slightly by the infrastructure sharing patch, to support transfer payments involving more than one company.
AkipTsaqif
Engineer
Posts: 21 Joined: 28 Apr 2016 11:11
Post
by AkipTsaqif 28 Apr 2016 11:48
Hi JGR.
I have a problem with your latest patch pack (v0.13). Whenever I created desert map (neither a new game nor scenario editor), it doesn't have any highlands anymore (the one with grasses and trees).
Is this ok? I don't like it because it makes me harder to grow cities.
Thanks
.
Attachments
Tanpa nama, 1 Jan 1935.png Here I attached the screenshot. (113.89 KiB) Not downloaded yet
vazoun51
Engineer
Posts: 20 Joined: 05 Sep 2015 21:23
Post
by vazoun51 28 Apr 2016 13:24
Eddi and JGR you are absolutely right. I just don't understand the way that bank bookkeeping is modified to be equivalent to vehicle bookkeping. When i add up all sums from group info it makes much more then revenues in my balance sheet. If it would be really calculated the way Eddi wrote, it should be the same. It doesn't matter if the whole income is assigned to one vehicle or it is divided between more of them. The amount of money is still the same. But i'm afraid that portion of money assigned to the transfer vehicle is added to the group info sum as well as the whole sum after delivery. These same sums you can see in yellow and green floating on your screen above the vehicle. Thus percentage assigned to the transfer vehicles is added twice to group info sums. That explains why group info says my road vehicles earned 27 mil. last year but balance sheet says just 7 mil. I use them as feeders for trains and much of their income is "imagined" as you wrote Eddi.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
